tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4102092409620291902.post139236515057893202..comments2023-06-08T12:37:20.523+01:00Comments on All Things Made New: Mysteries of the RosaryUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4102092409620291902.post-41118508734936321522012-05-29T19:55:45.317+01:002012-05-29T19:55:45.317+01:00It is possible to argue that the two points you me...It is possible to argue that the two points you mention are not essential to the meaning of the Rosary. However in my view an instinctive Marian traditionalist like John Paul II would not have made such a change unless he felt "authorized" or inspired to do so by heaven.Stratford Caldecotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05239053224257881002noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4102092409620291902.post-53329375066844913052012-05-27T15:51:01.090+01:002012-05-27T15:51:01.090+01:00I had never considered the addition of the fourth ...I had never considered the addition of the fourth set of mysteries as "completing" the ancient tradition by associating the mysteries with the four gospels. However, it also seems to change the original numerical associations with the Trinity (3 sets of mysteries) and the 150 Aves corresponding to the 150 Psalms. I'm not sure if you discuss this in the book or not, but it is a bone of contention among traditionalists.Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14287271275791880747noreply@blogger.com